The above should be summarized in a statement and placed in a Declarations section before the reference list under a heading of Consent to participate and/or Consent to publish. Decline publication, typically on grounds of either there being insufficient support for the conclusions or a reassessment of the level of interest or advance in light of the reviewers' comments. Color illustrations should be submitted as RGB. Please note that changes to authorship cannot be made after acceptance of a manuscript. If an appeal merits further consideration, the editors may send the authors' response or the revised paper to one or more reviewers, or they may ask one reviewer to comment on the concerns raised by another reviewer. If the article has already been published online, depending on the nature and severity of the infraction: - an erratum/correction may be placed with the article - an expression of concern may be placed with the article 2: Nucleic Acids (Walker, J. The abstract should not contain any undefined abbreviations or unspecified references. If the article has already been published online, depending on the nature and severity of the infraction: A notice of suspected transgression of ethical standards in the peer review system may be included as part of the authors and articles bibliographic record. Examples of statements to be used when no ethical approval is required/exemption granted: This is an observational study. Research articles and non-research articles (e.g. If identifying characteristics are altered to protect anonymity, such as in genetic profiles, authors should provide assurance that alterations do not distort meaning. When suggesting reviewers, authors should make sure they are totally independent and not connected to the work in any way. In the case of an authorship dispute during peer review or after acceptance and publication, the Journal will not be in a position to investigate or adjudicate. If doubt exists whether the research was conducted in accordance with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration or comparable standards, the authors must explain the reasons for their approach, and demonstrate that an independent ethics committee or institutional review board explicitly approved the doubtful aspects of the study. Cite in the text by italic Arabic numerals in parentheses, set on the text line, numbered in the order they appear. sciencenature - If it goes for review, then it will be about a month before you get the comments. Authors should include the following statements (if applicable) in a separate section entitled Compliance with Ethical Standards when submitting a paper: Please note that standards could vary slightly per journal dependent on their peer review policies (i.e. A single study should not be split up into several parts to increase the quantity of submissions and submitted to various journals or to one journal over time (i.e. Review articles present an expert synthesis of evidence and may be treated as an authoritative work on a subject. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.. ->Editor assigned->Manuscript under consideration . All lines should be at least 0.1 mm (0.3 pt) wide. Answered by Shalender Singh What does "Under Editorial Consideration" mean? Hi Y'all, Hope everybody's doing well. Click Submit manuscript and you will be taken to our online submission system, where you can upload the required files and check on the status of your manuscript after submission. provided that you revise the paper to address a number of further editorial points. The editors of the receiving journal will take the reviews into account when making their decision, although in some cases they may choose to take advice from additional reviewers. See also Authorship Principles. This retrospective chart review study involving human participants was in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Financial interests: Stocks or shares in companies (including holdings of spouse and/or children) that may gain or lose financially through publication of this manuscript; consultation fees or other forms of remuneration from organizations that may gain or lose financially; patents or patent applications whose value may be affected by publication of this manuscript. This is in particular applicable to case studies. Upon transfer, if the manuscript is assessed by the receiving journal to be a good fit and technically sound, it may be accepted without further review. The Publisher does not prescribe the kinds of contributions that warrant authorship. ]]> ). For life science journals only (when applicable). The experts at Springer Nature Author Services can help you with manuscript preparationincluding English language editing, developmental comments, manuscript formatting, figure preparation, translation, and more. manuscript under editorial consideration nature methods Examples include, but are not limited to: position on editorial board, advisory board or board of directors or other type of management relationships; writing and/or consulting for educational purposes; expert witness; mentoring relations; and so forth. These guidelines describe authorship principles and good authorship practices to which prospective authors should adhere to. Editors decide whether to send a manuscript for peer review based on the degree to which it advances our understanding of the field, the soundness of conclusions, the extent to which the evidence presented - including appropriate data and analyses - supports these conclusions, and the wide relevance of these conclusions to the journals readership. Online: 5. Conceptualization: [full name], ; Methodology: [full name], ; Formal analysis and investigation: [full name], ; Writing - original draft preparation: [full name, ]; Writing - review and editing: [full name], ; Funding acquisition: [full name], ; Resources: [full name], ; Supervision: [full name],. 1) made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data; or the creation of new software used in the work; 2) drafted the work or revised it critically for important intellectual content; 3) approved the version to be published; and. The editor is reading your manuscript and figuring out whether or not she wants to send it for peer review. Perhaps, the subject editor assigned requires more time for assessing the manuscript. Authors are welcome to suggest suitable reviewers and/or request the exclusion of certain individuals when they submit their manuscripts. Please refer to the section on Informed Consent for additional help with completing this information. In the 'Reason' field, you must also fill in the reviewer's country. The first draft of the manuscript was written by [full name] and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. Springer Nature Author Services , , Springer Nature Author Services, . All figures are to be numbered using Arabic numerals. If any magnification is used in the photographs, indicate this by using scale bars within the figures themselves. No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript. and JavaScript. Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data and photographs. You should hear back within a week or two. If the manuscript is still under consideration, it may be rejected and returned to the author. 2002 Authors should follow the recommendations of the IUPAC-IUB Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest, Research involving Human Participants and/or Animals, Partial financial support was received from []. Where an Editor or Editorial Board Member is on the author list they must declare this in the competing interests section on the submitted manuscript. In case of data acquired via a biobank/biorepository, it is possible they apply a broad consent which allows research participants to consent to a broad range of uses of their data and samples which is regarded by research ethics committees as specific enough to be considered informed. Reviewers are notidentified to the authors, except at the request of the reviewer. The Journal and Publisher assume all authors agreed with the content and that all gave explicit consent to submit and that they obtained consent from the responsible authorities at the institute/organization where the work has been carried out, before the work is submitted. It is recommended that authors check the NCBI database for misidentification and contamination of human cell lines. Upon acceptance, your article will be exported to Production to undergo typesetting. Data availability statements should include information on where data supporting the results reported in the article can be found, if applicable. The editor and the editorial team discuss the reviewer reports, and decide whether the manuscript or a revised version of it could be published in the journal. Your revised manuscript should be submitted using the link provided in the decision email, and not as a new manuscript. The status changed to "Manuscript under editorial consideration" last night without it changing to "Editor decision started" like in other examples. Reuse of images: If images are being reused from prior publications, the Publisher will assume that the prior publication obtained the relevant information regarding consent. This is more confusing as generally, 'Manuscript Under consideration' means that the editor is considering the manuscript for peer review. Non-financial interests: Author A is on the board of directors of Y and receives no compensation as member of the board of directors. No funding was received for conducting this study. Offprints can be ordered by the corresponding author. I recently submitted a paper to a Nature journal. Springer Nature advocates complete and transparent reporting of biomedical and biological research and research with biological applications. //-->Submission Guidelines | Nature Biotechnology ensuring that all listed authors have approved the manuscript before submission, including the names and order of authors; managing all communication between the Journal and all co-authors, before and after publication;*. The Editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned guidelines. Further, please note that the manuscript status might not always be updated instantly. Internet Explorer). These are considered appeals, which, by policy, take second place to consideration of normal submissions. Examples include: translations or a manuscript that is intended for a different group of readers. The questionnaire and methodology for this study was approved by the Human Research Ethics committee of the University of D (Ethics approval number: ). The primary affiliation for each author should be the institution where the majority of their work was done. This research study was conducted retrospectively from data obtained for clinical purposes. If you are unsure whether your paper is in scope for Nature Biotechnology, you can submit a presubmission enquiry, providing an abstract of your work.You can do this in our online Manuscript . Reviewer selection is critical to the review process, and we work hard to ensure that the different technical and conceptual aspects of the work are covered. Use of an LLM should be properly documented in the Methods section (and if a Methods section is not available, in a suitable alternative part) of the manuscript. [deleted] 4 yr. ago. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study., Written informed consent was obtained from the parents.. If an author has subsequently moved, the current address may additionally be stated. Why my paper is still in "under consideration" for such a long time? Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study. Non-financial interests: Author D has served on advisory boards for Company M and Company N., The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.. Examples of statements to be used when funding has been received: Examples of statements to be used when there is no funding: Examples of statements to be used when there are interests to declare: Non-financial interests: Author C is an unpaid member of committee Z. It is difficult to specify a threshold at which a financial interest becomes significant, any such figure is necessarily arbitrary, so one possible practical guideline is the following: "Any undeclared financial interest that could embarrass the author were it to become publicly known after the work was published.". Please do not suggest anyone who may have a conflict of interest in reviewing your manuscript, such as former advisors, students, or recent collaborators. Cationic, often amphiphilic, peptides with antimicrobial . General repositories - for all types of research data - such as figshare and Dryad may be used where appropriate. Out of . Cactus Communications. More templates for data availability statements, including examples of openly available and restricted access datasets, are available here: This journal strongly encourages that all datasets on which the conclusions of the paper rely are available to readers. The preprint can then be easily transferred directly from the bioRxiv or medRxiv submission system to Review Commons. Data citations should include a persistent identifier (such as a DOI), should be included in the reference list using the minimum information recommended by DataCite, and follow journal style. All original research must include a data availability statement. Sensitive information in the form of confidential or proprietary data is excluded. RRIDs are provided by the Resource Identification Portal. Please prepare the article as a Microsoft Word document. Notably an attribution of authorship carries with it accountability for the work, which cannot be effectively applied to LLMs. Icons made by various authors from www.flaticon.com, Experiential Live Edit: How to improve Biomed manuscripts. Before submitting your article check the instructions following this section carefully. What does the status under consideration mean? //--> Improve the chances of your manuscripts acceptance by learning how to prepare a manuscript for journal submission and handle the peer review process. A cover letter must accompany the submission giving the rationale for publication in Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, particularly with respect to the originality, scientific merit and importance to the field of Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology. Author C has received speaker and consultant honoraria from Company M. Dr. C has received speaker honorarium and research funding from Company M and Company N. Author D has received travel support from Company O. Please note that using these tools, or any other service, is not a requirement for publication, nor does it imply or guarantee that editors will accept the article, or even select it for peer review. Please see Springer Natures information on recommended repositories. Exact requirements may vary depending on the journal; please refer to the journals Instructions for Authors. Identify all elements found in the figure in the figure caption; and use boxes, circles, etc., as coordinate points in graphs. We encourage authors to ensure that their datasets are either deposited in publicly available repositories (where available and appropriate) or presented in the main manuscript or additional supporting files whenever possible. Accessed December 31, 2006. But since the beginning, the status was "under consideration", until now. The review process at Nature Chemical Biology includes two steps: editorial assessment and external peer review. Macgregor, S. (1993), PhD thesis, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK. In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles Science Journals: Editorial Policies | Science | AAAS and JavaScript. Your manuscript is already in great shape but please go through our guidelines below that specify the correct formatting of your final . Not logged in A decision on how to correct the literature will depend on the nature of the error. This study was reviewed and deemed exempt by our XYZ Institutional Review Board. All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files]. 333341. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? [CDATA[// >Editorial Process & Peer Review | Nature Sustainability If the manuscript status has been showing under consideration for a long time, there are a couple of possibilities: reviewers might be getting shortlisted, reviewers may not have been invited yet, or invited reviewers may not have accepted the invitation. We consulted extensively with the IRB of XYZ who determined that our study did not need ethical approval. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by [full name], [full name] and [full name]. Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent. Regardless of whether material is collected from living or dead patients, they (family or guardian if the deceased has not made a pre-mortem decision) must have given prior written consent.