sample objections to interrogatories florida

District of Florida, copies of written interrogatories, answers and objections to interrogatories, notices of oral depositions, transcripts of oral depositions, requests for the production of documents and other things, responses to requests for production, matters disclosed pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1), Federal Rules of Civil % /S /P A. Preparation and Answering of Interrogatories | Middle District of <> Form 4 - MEDICAL MALPRACTICE - INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT. /K [7] 2023 Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin, P.C. /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /Type /StructElem /Type /Page 6 [97 0 R 98 0 R 99 0 R 100 0 R 101 0 R 102 0 R 103 0 R 104 0 R 105 0 R 106 0 R /Pg 33 0 R /Type /StructElem /Length 484 0 R 58 0 obj<> endobj /K [0] << /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /S /P /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /P 472 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /Page endobj /P 474 0 R 316 0 obj endobj << 0000007296 00000 n 9 [120 0 R 121 0 R 122 0 R 123 0 R 124 0 R 125 0 R] /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R 74 0 obj endobj /Type /StructElem /Pg 25 0 R >> /Tabs /S >> /Pg 17 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 14 0 R /Type /StructElem >> /Type /Page << /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] << /Type /StructElem endobj /P 10 0 R /P 479 0 R /P 456 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] >> >> /K [10] /Pg 29 0 R /Type /StructElem Please keep this in mind if you use this service for this website. 207 0 obj endobj /P 10 0 R /K [3] endobj /Resources 373 0 R /K [19] /Annots [] /Type /StructElem 0000004654 00000 n 115 0 obj << /K [2] /P 476 0 R endobj P. 1.280(b); Fla. R. Civ. 101 0 obj endobj /S /P /P 471 0 R >> >> endobj /K [3] endobj /P 441 0 R << /Tabs /S endobj 124 0 obj /Type /StructElem /K [2] /StructParents 17 prepared or assisted in the preparation of the responses to these interrogatories. /S /P /Type /StructElem /Pg 16 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj /S /LBody /K [286 0 R] 1: Interrogatory No. << /K [3] /P 10 0 R endobj /S /LBody /K [3] Generalized assertions of privilege will be rejected. /Resources 378 0 R /Pg 29 0 R /K [1] /StructTreeRoot 3 0 R 73 0 obj >> /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R /K [0] endobj /K [10] /StructParents 16 192 0 obj <> 208 0 obj To maximize the likelihood of obtaining requested social media evidence, carefully craft interrogatories and requests for production to encompass relevant and reasonably calculated materials. endobj RESPONSE TO FORM INTERROGATORY NO. >> /P 472 0 R /K [30] << << /K [3] PDF Florida Conference of Circuit Judges endobj 387 (E.D. /Pg 16 0 R M i c r o s o f t W o r d 2 0 1 6; modified using iText 2.1.7 by 1T3XT /Pg 26 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /Group /P 10 0 R OBJECTIONS. >> /Pg 34 0 R << In litigation, written discovery typically consists of (1) Requests for Production, (2) Requests for Admission, and (3) Interrogatories. /P 10 0 R endobj >> Interrogatories requests that the responding party answer the questions under oath. endobj 0000002210 00000 n >> /S /LBody 0000053149 00000 n /P 10 0 R << endobj 54 0 obj endobj /S /P endobj /S /P >> /Type /StructElem endobj endobj /Type /StructElem A claim of privilege must be supported by a statement of particulars sufficient to enable the Court to assess its validity. >> << endobj >> /S /P Criminal Charges Against Alec Baldwin Dropped, Fox News To Pay $787.5 Million to Dominion Voting Systems for Defamation, Paltrow Prevails in Celebrity Ski Crash Trial. 252 0 obj /S /P /S /P /K [7] /ID (Note 1) << /S /P >> endobj /S /P << >> (Do not identify anyone who simply typed or reproduced the responses.) Blanket, unsupported objections that a discovery /Parent 6 0 R /P 10 0 R /Tabs /S 235 0 obj endobj >> /Annots [] Fla. R. Civ. 46 0 R 47 0 R 48 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R 51 0 R 52 0 R 53 0 R 54 0 R 55 0 R << /S /LBody /P 10 0 R /K [5] 58 16 endobj And social medias footprint is ever-expandingas of the third quarter of 2017, Facebook had more than 2 billion monthly active users, up from 1 billion in 2012. >> /Footnote /Note /K [1] /Type /StructElem /RoleMap 8 0 R 303.1: Objection. /P 3 0 R /ParentTreeNextKey 25 endobj >> 0000002293 00000 n /S /P /Pg 14 0 R Interrogatories, Requests for Productions, and Admissions & /Pg 25 0 R <> 0000007100 00000 n /Pg 20 0 R /P 10 0 R /Pg 16 0 R endobj /Type /StructElem /P 454 0 R endobj /Pg 13 0 R /Group 324 0 R 107 0 obj /Pg 19 0 R /P 474 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 17 0 R 98 0 obj /P 10 0 R /S /P 193 0 obj /P 10 0 R /S /P 307 0 obj /K [2] >> /Pg 34 0 R /S /P Fla. R. Civ. /P 10 0 R 42 0 obj /Pg 26 0 R /Parent 6 0 R >> /K [8] >> /Tabs /S /P 472 0 R >> endobj 0000000914 00000 n endobj 0000002146 00000 n >> /S /P endobj /P 10 0 R /S /P << >> /P 460 0 R << endobj /K [4] The interrogatory also seeks attorney work-product in violation of Code of Civil Procedure sections 2018.020 and 2018.030. /K [4] /Type /StructElem /Pg 28 0 R /P 10 0 R 33 0 obj P9j+,?ej$N"tvdo6K^V [GInka<88[qG v\ +`8l.reO-ygFXxn'H7'S: V4C[Q Yd57XCr[&3))\JMp /P 466 0 R 26 0 obj << 121 0 obj /P 10 0 R /P 473 0 R 289 0 obj /S /P /P 447 0 R P. 1.340(a). /Type /StructElem >> 12 [135 0 R 136 0 R 287 0 R 138 0 R 139 0 R 140 0 R 141 0 R 142 0 R 143 0 R] endobj PDF OBJECTIONS TO INTERROGATORIES - Supreme Court of Florida >> /Pg 34 0 R >> << +Q Er) P. 1.280(e). endobj 34 0 obj endobj /Pg 13 0 R >> endobj endobj /K [0] Not surprisingly, many plaintiffs now object to any discovery requests seeking social media information on grounds including overbreadth, vagueness and violation of the right to privacy. /Pg 26 0 R /Pg 31 0 R >> /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /K [17] /S /P /Pg 14 0 R /S /L /Type /StructElem /P 449 0 R /K [5] /Pg 33 0 R /Pg 20 0 R For reprints, contacttamontemuro@mdwcg.com. endobj /S /P /K [15] /Type /StructElem /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /Type /Page 0000007591 00000 n /P 10 0 R 157 0 obj 66 0 R 67 0 R 68 0 R 69 0 R 70 0 R 71 0 R 72 0 R 73 0 R 74 0 R 75 0 R 5047 /P 10 0 R endobj /K [7] 1 0 obj /Type /Page >> /Workbook /Document >> /K [1] << /Type /StructElem /K [3] /P 10 0 R 320 0 obj /P 10 0 R /Pg 13 0 R /Marked true endobj /S /P /S /P /P 475 0 R 0000004751 00000 n /P 10 0 R /Pg 31 0 R Enter to open, tab to navigate, enter to select, https://content.next.westlaw.com/practical-law/document/Ia9defb5505ba11ecbea4f0dc9fb69570/Interrogatories-Responding-to-Interrogatories-FL?viewType=FullText&transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default), Interrogatories: Responding to Interrogatories (FL). /Type /StructElem /K [19] /S /P >> 0000001255 00000 n /P 10 0 R {x$K3*q|FC8.xw,96xt*"\'g&`=>-YS6} D1Wq{Z%RLDH1. This interrogatory is overbroad and would allow undue access into the Respondent's private information. << /Type /StructElem 0000052777 00000 n 23 0 obj /S /P /P 10 0 R /DisplayDocTitle true /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /Pg 14 0 R << 204 0 obj /Pg 16 0 R << /Resources 393 0 R << /S /P 222 0 obj /Type /StructElem /S /P /Type /StructElem /Contents [360 0 R 361 0 R 362 0 R] /Annots [] /Type /StructElem /K [11] /P 10 0 R >> /Type /StructElem >> /P 10 0 R /S /P /Pg 27 0 R /Type /StructElem >> /Type /StructElem >> /Group 429 0 R /K [2] 181 0 obj Each defendant's responses to these requests are essentially identical, with the exception of Interrogatory No. 284 0 R 285 0 R] /K [7] /S /P >> 311 0 obj endobj /P 10 0 R /Annots [] /P 10 0 R /Group 344 0 R /K [18] 126 0 obj 109 0 obj /S /P /K [0] >> /P 10 0 R 71 0 obj /K [1] /S /P /P 472 0 R >> /P 473 0 R 212 0 obj >> endobj /K [7] OBJECTIONS TO INTERROGATORIES The Respondent, Judge Linda D. Schoonover, by and through her undersigned counsel, files her Objections to the First Set of Interrogatories propounded by Special Counsel and says: Objection. 0000177044 00000 n /P 10 0 R << /K [5] 21 0 obj endobj endobj >> /K [5] /K 26 Florida Court Rules | Appendix I - STANDARD INTERROGATORIES - Casetext /S /P endobj /Resources 348 0 R /Type /Page 11 0 obj /P 10 0 R << /Pg 16 0 R /K [1] /K [11] endobj /S /P /Type /Page endobj 298 0 obj << /Type /StructElem >> /Pg 14 0 R endobj /Pg 31 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 34 0 R 197 0 obj /K [0] This article provides guidance on countering objections arising during discovery in Florida state actions. <>/Metadata 338 0 R/ViewerPreferences 339 0 R>> << /Kids [13 0 R 14 0 R 15 0 R 16 0 R 17 0 R 18 0 R 19 0 R 20 0 R 21 0 R 22 0 R /S /P /S /P /Pg 17 0 R /Type /StructElem << endobj /K [4] /S /LBody RESPONSE: Complainant contends that the following relationships to the Complainant are held for persons identified in Interrogatory No. If the defendant has surveillance films or Facebook posts of your client and wants to use them as evidence, they must be disclosed AFTER the plaintiff's deposition. endobj Philadelphia, PA 19103, Defense Digest,Vol. /P 10 0 R 165 0 obj >> /Pg 34 0 R /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem This Note also explains how to draft the response, including the answers or objections to specific interrogatories, and how a party may elect to produce documents in response to an interrogatory. /P 10 0 R /P 10 0 R /Contents [390 0 R 391 0 R 392 0 R] /P 10 0 R /Pg 17 0 R /Pg 25 0 R >> /Pg 13 0 R After the trial court denied its motion, the defendant filed narrower discovery requests. /Pg 33 0 R 0000005561 00000 n 159 0 obj << /S /P /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /A 459 0 R endobj >> endobj endobj /P 10 0 R << /S /P /Type /StructElem endobj << /S /P /Pg 17 0 R /Contents [385 0 R 386 0 R 387 0 R] 233 0 obj 0000051500 00000 n /P 468 0 R /S /LBody 291 0 obj /K [15] endobj >> /Pg 34 0 R 155 0 R 156 0 R 157 0 R 158 0 R 159 0 R 160 0 R 161 0 R 162 0 R 163 0 R 164 0 R /S /P /Type /StructElem /K [7] 2011) (holding that postings on a plaintiffs Facebook account, if relevant, are not precluded from discovery because the plaintiff utilized privacy settings); Tompkins v. Detroit Metro. 671 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[]/Index[655 32]/Info 654 0 R/Length 81/Prev 387279/Root 656 0 R/Size 687/Type/XRef/W[1 2 1]>>stream endobj /Footer /Sect /Pg 34 0 R /S /P /K [5] /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /Tabs /S /K [16] 48 0 obj 70 0 obj >> endobj /S /P endobj /Pg 19 0 R << << /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /S /LBody /Pg 34 0 R /P 472 0 R <> x[[s~OUVj[THdwr9=aflnI$e%nZ|UQ>IC1$N* 3.1: >> /Tabs /S /S /P endobj /P 472 0 R >> /Pg 28 0 R 270 0 obj /K [7] /Pg 29 0 R << endobj PDF 1 Samuel J. Muir (Sbn 89883) Stephen B. Litchfield (Sbn 284951) Collins stream /K [21] /S /P /Pg 16 0 R << << /Type /StructElem /P 443 0 R 284 0 obj /Pg 17 0 R << /S /P /P 10 0 R 127 0 obj 0000177635 00000 n Answers made by a party are not binding on a co-party. endobj PDF Effective Use of Objections in Responding to Interrogatories 1 0 obj /Type /StructElem This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship. << /Pg 23 0 R /Parent 6 0 R /P 10 0 R /Pg 20 0 R 120 0 obj /P 473 0 R 24, No. /StructParents 10 >> /Group 374 0 R >> MOTIONS TO COMPEL, FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER, OR TO QUASH. /Type /StructElem 1, March 2018, Responding to Social Media Discovery Objections. >> endobj endobj 179 0 obj /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] endstream endobj 656 0 obj <>/Metadata 30 0 R/PageLayout/OneColumn/Pages 653 0 R/StructTreeRoot 174 0 R/Type/Catalog>> endobj 657 0 obj <>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI]>>/Rotate 0/StructParents 0/Type/Page>> endobj 658 0 obj <>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Subtype/Form/Type/XObject>>stream /StructParents 6 /Pg 27 0 R << OBJECTIONS: Relevance. 0000000616 00000 n >> /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem /Pg 13 0 R << endobj /Type /Catalog /StructParents 21 << << /Type /StructElem >> /P 10 0 R /K [39] /Type /StructElem 18 0 obj >> C. Other Interrogatory Issues | Middle District of Florida | United endobj /S /P 63 0 obj /K [284 0 R 285 0 R] /Pg 14 0 R >> P. 1.340 (a). << /K [6] << Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.340 - Interrogatories to Parties - provides that a party may serve on any other party written interrogatories. 189 0 obj /Filter /FlateDecode /Annots [] 4 [72 0 R 73 0 R 74 0 R 75 0 R 76 0 R 77 0 R 78 0 R 79 0 R 80 0 R 81 0 R 0000008012 00000 n endobj /Type /StructElem << << endstream endobj 59 0 obj<> endobj 61 0 obj<> endobj 62 0 obj<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/ExtGState<>>> endobj 63 0 obj<> endobj 64 0 obj<> endobj 65 0 obj<> endobj 66 0 obj[/ICCBased 71 0 R] endobj 67 0 obj<> endobj 68 0 obj<> endobj 69 0 obj<> endobj 70 0 obj<>stream /K [7] /Pg 26 0 R /S /P 297 0 obj << >> /Type /StructElem 0000004919 00000 n /K [8] /P 471 0 R 258 0 obj << /Pg 13 0 R 0000052510 00000 n /Type /StructElem 0000173956 00000 n >> Is Google Responsible for Terrorist Attacks. /Type /StructElem /K [37] endobj endobj /P 477 0 R /P 471 0 R << /Type /StructElem startxref 300 0 R 301 0 R 302 0 R 303 0 R 304 0 R 305 0 R 306 0 R 307 0 R 308 0 R 309 0 R 62 0 obj /Type /StructElem 231 0 obj /Pg 13 0 R /Pg 13 0 R /K [437 0 R 438 0 R] /Pg 29 0 R /Pg 33 0 R >> << << /Pg 17 0 R /K [6] /Type /StructElem << endobj /Pg 16 0 R 301 0 obj /K [9] << /K [9] /Type /StructElem endobj /Pg 24 0 R /Type /StructElem >> /K [480 0 R 302 0 R] /P 10 0 R /Contents [355 0 R 356 0 R 357 0 R] /Contents [325 0 R 326 0 R 327 0 R] 274 0 obj /Type /StructElem /K [26] /Pg 13 0 R /K [2] 0000005141 00000 n /P 10 0 R >> /Parent 6 0 R /Group 384 0 R >> /Pg 27 0 R /S /P xref /P 36 0 R /Type /StructElem << /K [10] /K [6] Each interrogatory shall be answered separately and fully in writing under oath unless it is objected to, in which event the grounds for objection shall be stated and signed by the attorney making it. Fla. R. Civ. /K [0] endobj << /S /L 43 0 obj endobj endobj /Type /StructElem /K [9] << $~)+Is2JdR3?RJc[1+@a << /S /P /K [10] /P 10 0 R 15 0 obj 107 0 obj <> endobj endobj /Type /StructElem /Pg 18 0 R /Type /Page /Pg 15 0 R /StructParents 13 /K [7] << << /S /P endobj endobj /Group 399 0 R 0000006573 00000 n 156 0 obj Specific objections should be matched to specific interrogatories. /K [0] << /Pg 29 0 R /Pg 22 0 R << << 148 0 obj /P 10 0 R /Parent 6 0 R /P 10 0 R /K [481 0 R 315 0 R] /Type /StructElem /K [0] >> endobj /Pg 16 0 R /P 10 0 R 83 0 obj /P 10 0 R >> stream /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] << /S /P >> 0000177393 00000 n /Tabs /S >> >> /P 451 0 R /S /P >> The plaintiff argued such access was overbroad and would violate her right to privacy. /Pg 16 0 R << This website uses Google Translate, a free service. /P 10 0 R /S /P /K [4] An interrogatory may ask for an opinion or contention that relates to fact or the application of law to fact, or that asks for information not within the personal knowledge of the party. >> endobj 287 0 obj /Group 424 0 R /P 10 0 R >> << /Resources 358 0 R 242 0 obj /P 10 0 R >> /K [2] >> PDF Green & Hall, Llp A Practice Note discussing how to draft and serve a response to interrogatories in a Florida circuit court civil case. /Group 349 0 R >> /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R 46 0 obj /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem << /Type /StructElem >> endobj /IDTree 9 0 R 271 0 obj /Pg 29 0 R /Type /StructElem /K [6] 325 0 obj 293 0 obj 257 0 obj <> 268 0 obj /P 10 0 R /K [13] endobj /Parent 6 0 R /Pg 34 0 R /S /P %%EOF 285 0 obj These "general objections" generally include claims that the discovery requests are: 1) overbroad; 2) burdensome; 3) not relevant nor likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; 4) not appropriately limited in time; 5) seek information protected by the attorney client and/or work product privilege; and 6) not limited to products or issues which are substantially similar to the . 53 0 obj /Type /StructElem endobj 113 0 obj >> /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem /Annots [] << General or blanket objections should be used only when they apply to every interrogatory. /S /P /Tabs /S /Pg 19 0 R >> /Parent 6 0 R /Type /Page 1.1: Collins Collins Muir + Stewart LLP, 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1700, Oakland, California 94612; (510) 844-5100. >> /K [10] 73 0 obj /Type /StructElem /S /P /Type /StructElem /Pg 18 0 R 16 [178 0 R 179 0 R 180 0 R 181 0 R 292 0 R 183 0 R 184 0 R 185 0 R 186 0 R 187 0 R /K [9] /K [39] This is a little point to objections to interrogatories. /Type /StructElem /S /Link 2000 Market Street, Suite 2300 216 0 obj /S /P /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /Lang (en-US) /S /P /Pg 31 0 R >> /S /L 6 and Document Request No. 143 0 obj endobj << 246 0 obj Posts, tweets, grams and snaps have entirely different meanings in todays lexicon than they did a decade ago. P. 1.340(d). >> endobj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem /S /P Mich. 2012) (holding that material posted on a private Facebook page is generally not privileged or protected by privacy claims); Mailhoit v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., 285 F.R.D. /S /Span 160 0 obj >> /S /P /K [6] << >> 39 0 obj /K [2] /P 476 0 R /Type /StructElem 655 0 obj <> endobj endobj /K [3] << /K [29] >> /S /P /Macrosheet /Part /P 10 0 R /S /P << >> endobj endobj /P 10 0 R endobj 149 0 obj /K [482 0 R 317 0 R] endobj /P 10 0 R /ParentTree 11 0 R /P 474 0 R << /Type /StructElem 326 0 obj /K [4] 302 0 obj Interrogatories that generally require the responding party to state the basis of particular claims, defenses, or contentions in pleadings or other documents should be used sparingly and, if used, should be designed (1) to target claims, defenses, or contentions that the propounding attorney reasonably suspects may be the proper subject of early /Contents [425 0 R 426 0 R 427 0 R] /K [9] /P 473 0 R /S /P /Type /StructElem >> endobj /P 10 0 R >> Such objections do not comply with Local Rule 26.1(e)(2)(A), which provides that, when an objection is made to any interrogatory or sub-part thereof or to any document request under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 34, the objection shall state with specificity all grounds. /Type /StructElem /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] endobj /P 444 0 R /S /P /Type /Page /Pg 34 0 R /S /P >> /Type /StructElem /CS /DeviceRGB endobj /S /P >> For more detailed information, please see the SmartRules Response to Interrogatory Guide for the court where your action is pending. << 168 0 obj /Type /StructElem /S /L /S /P /Pg 21 0 R << endobj >> /S /P /P 478 0 R << 8 [115 0 R 116 0 R 117 0 R 118 0 R 119 0 R] 91 0 obj /Pg 30 0 R endobj 185 0 R 186 0 R 187 0 R 188 0 R 189 0 R 190 0 R 191 0 R 192 0 R 193 0 R 194 0 R P. 1.340(c). 201 0 obj /Pg 25 0 R >> Plaintiff`s Responses And Objections To Defendant`s Second Request For /Annots [] /Type /StructElem /Pg 29 0 R /Contents [420 0 R 421 0 R 422 0 R] << << << 100 0 obj 6 0 obj /Contents [365 0 R 366 0 R 367 0 R] endstream Prior to the plaintiffs deposition, defense counsel saw that her Facebook profile contained 1,285 photographs. /Pg 31 0 R Objections to portions of a document request do not excuse the responding party from producing those documents to which there is no objection. << /Group 379 0 R << >> /Pg 22 0 R /Parent 6 0 R >> /K [7] /Type /StructElem >> 0000000016 00000 n /K [3] endobj /K [18] /Type /StructElem Responding to Social Media Discovery Objections - Marshall Dennehey endobj /StructParents 1 /P 10 0 R << /Contents [345 0 R 346 0 R 347 0 R] /K [2] << << /StructParents 11 << endstream >> /Pg 26 0 R 450 0 R 451 0 R 452 0 R] >> endobj 75 0 obj /S /P /Pg 15 0 R << 60 0 obj<>stream /K [4] endobj << 72 41 /Pg 25 0 R endobj /S /P /Group 329 0 R /Pg 15 0 R endobj /S /P endobj /Pg 14 0 R /S /P /K [3] /Contents [340 0 R 341 0 R 342 0 R] /Type /StructElem << 59 0 obj /Type /StructElem /Type /StructElem << >> 0000051133 00000 n /Type /StructElem When responding to such objections, defense attorneys should be prepared to argue that Nucci does not limit social media discovery solely to photographs; it allows for the discovery of social media evidence that is relevant and reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. . /K [5] 103 0 obj /S /P /S /P << << 182 0 obj 25 0 obj /Pg 28 0 R << /Pg 13 0 R endobj >> /Creator /Type /StructElem 0000051645 00000 n << >> << 266 0 obj /Pg 14 0 R /S /LBody /P 10 0 R /S /P /Type /StructElem /K [4] /S /P endobj endobj /Artifact /Sect 128 0 obj endobj /P 10 0 R /P 35 0 R endobj /K [9] /Type /StructElem /Pg 27 0 R endobj >> /Type /StructElem endobj >> /Type /StructElem /S /P /S /P /K [30] /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R 0000052244 00000 n /Type /StructElem /S /P /S /P endobj >> >> Defense Digestis prepared by Marshall Dennehey Warner Coleman & Goggin to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers. 177 0 obj endobj Administrative Procedures for Electronic Filing (PDF), Handbook for Trial Jurors Serving in the United States District Courts (PDF), Plan for Qualification and Selection of Grand and Petit Jurors (PDF), VII. << endobj Rule 12.340 - INTERROGATORIES TO PARTIES, Fla. Fam. Law. R - Casetext 13 0 obj /Type /Metadata /P 10 0 R /ITXT (2.1.7) /Pg 26 0 R /S /P endobj /Pg 27 0 R /K [11] >> /StructParents 2 Nevertheless, as support for its general conclusions, the Fourth District relied on cases involving the discovery of social media materials beyond photographs. /Pg 13 0 R /Type /StructElem endobj /MediaBox [0 0 607.0200195312 795.4799804688] /P 10 0 R 135 0 obj << >> << /Type /StructElem /Contents [380 0 R 381 0 R 382 0 R] 0000007029 00000 n /P 10 0 R /K [36] endobj << endobj endobj >> /K [1] /Type /StructElem /Pg 16 0 R /K [16] l+-M2hPm c/n` lM# /Resources 403 0 R /Pg 30 0 R The total number of interrogatories to be propounded without leave of court must not exceed thirty (30), including all subparts. << /Linearized 1 /L 325360 /H [ 1696 230 ] /O 75 /E 232069 /N 2 /T 323796 >> /Type /StructElem /P 10 0 R /S /P >> 28 0 obj /P 473 0 R /K [11] 117 0 obj <> endstream endobj startxref /K [6] endobj endobj /Type /StructElem /K [0] This Interrogatory duplicative and overly burdensome, and harassing. /S /P 135 0 R 136 0 R 137 0 R 138 0 R 139 0 R 140 0 R 141 0 R 142 0 R 143 0 R 144 0 R /K [10] endobj endobj /K 28 /P 472 0 R endobj /K [8] endobj endobj /Resources 328 0 R 9 0 obj endobj /P 473 0 R << << 96 0 R] << 102 0 obj Specific objections should be matched to specific requests. endobj >> << endobj 114 0 obj /P 10 0 R 90 0 obj /Pg 17 0 R 64 0 R 65 0 R 66 0 R 67 0 R 68 0 R 69 0 R 70 0 R 71 0 R] /S /P endobj << /S /LBody /Annots [] endobj /P 10 0 R >> hb```\@( \0Y;9}z DKm[+\L9^00dt40ht00z i^$H@2z2ftdfge( ??wi]6NL ]s00^2J ] /Pg 26 0 R 87 0 obj /S /P /K [4] endobj >> 264 0 R 265 0 R 266 0 R 267 0 R 268 0 R 269 0 R 38 0 R 39 0 R 40 0 R 41 0 R] /P 10 0 R /Type /StructElem >> >> >> /Type /StructElem /K [8] 115 0 R 116 0 R 117 0 R 118 0 R 119 0 R 120 0 R 121 0 R 122 0 R 123 0 R 124 0 R << endobj